In terms of Rule 48 of Public Procurement Rules, 2004, a Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) is notified for the subject procurement and the notification copy is available on the procuring agency’s website and on Authority’s website at (www.ppra.org.pk).
National Disaster Risk Management Fund (National Disaster Risk Management Fund (NDRMF)), Manager
5th Floor, EOBI House, G-10/4., Islamabad Capital Territory
+92-321-400-4044
muhammad.asif@ndrmf.pk
Sections of Prequalifica¬tion Documents
The following specific data for the Prequalification of Applicants shall complement, supplement, or amend the provisions in the Instructions to Applicants (ITA). Whenever there is a conflict, the provisions herein shall prevail over those in ITA.
PDS Clause Number
ITA Number
Amendments of, and Supplements to, Clauses in the Instructions to Applicants
PDS Clause Number 1
ITA Number 1.1
Identification Number of the Invitation for Prequalification: P79171
The Procuring Agency is: National Disaster Risk Management Fund (National Disaster Risk Management Fund (NDRMF))
List of Service Contracts:
See section services and Lots
PDS Clause Number 2
ITA Number 2.1
The name of Procuring Agency is: National Disaster Risk Management Fund (National Disaster Risk Management Fund (NDRMF))
The name of Project / Procurement is: Hiring of Consulting Firm to Conduct Institutional Performance Evaluation of NDRMF (2016-2025)
PDS Clause Number 3
ITA Number 4.2
Maximum number of members in a Joint Venture (JV): 2
PDS Clause Number 4
ITA Number 4.5
A list of debarred firms and individuals is available on PPRA website: https://ppra.gov.pk
PDS Clause Number 5
ITA Number 7.1
For clarification, the Applicant shall seek clarifications through: EPADS v2.0
PDS Clause Number 6
ITA Number 7.1 & 8.2
Information related to Prequalification shall be published on: EPADS v2.0
PDS Clause Number 7
ITA Number 7.2
Pre-Application Meeting: Clarification Date: Monday, August 31, 2026
PDS Clause Number 8
ITA Number 10.1
This Prequalification Document has been issued in the language: English
PDS Clause Number 9
ITA Number 11.1(d)
Additional documents to be submitted through EPADS v2.0:
PDS Clause Number 10
ITA Number 14.2
Source for determining exchange rates: Not Applicable
PDS Clause Number 11
ITA Number 16.1
Deadline for Application Submission:
Day: Monday
Date: Monday, September 7, 2026
Time: 11:00 AM
PDS Clause Number 12
ITA Number 17.1
Opening of Applications shall be conducted through: EPADS v2.0
Day: Monday
Date: Monday, September 7, 2026
Time: 11:30 AM
Virtual participation link: https://vendors.epads.gov.pk/
PDS Clause Number 13
ITA Number 21.1
Margin of Domestic Preference: Not Applicable
(Applicable only if authorized in Procurement Plan)
PDS Clause Number 14
ITA Number 29.1
Prequalification-related complaints / grievances shall be submitted in writing through: EPADS v2.0
A complaint may challenge:
Eligible Bidders: Sole Proprietorship, Partnership Firm, Company (Private Limited), Company (Public Limited), Company (Holding Company), Company (Limited by Guarantee), State Owned Enterprise (Private Limited), State Owned Enterprise (Public Limited), NGO / NPO, IGO
| Required Registration |
|---|
|
FBR (NTN) FBR (GSTN) |
| Eligibility Criteria | Document |
|---|---|
| i. Firm’s Registration with authorized Government Department(s) as Legal Entity Provide Copy | Yes |
| ii. Having registration with Income & Sales Tax Departments – Provide the copy of Tax registration certificates for both | Yes |
| iii. Active on Income & Sales Tax (Provide ATL status) | Yes |
| iv. Affidavit confirming that: (a) applicant Consultant (Name of the Consultant) has never been blacklisted by any National, Government/Semi Government Organization and (b) All the information provided by the applicant Consultant is correct. | Yes |
Quality Based Selection (QBS)
Weightage (Without Financial Criteria)
| Technical Evaluation % |
|---|
| 100 |
| Technical Marks | 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Passing Marks | 60 | |
| Technical Competence: | ||
| Must have minimum Ten (10) years of professional experience. (Firms shall provide documentary evidence to establish their experience). (Quantitative)(Doc Required) | 30 | |
| • Have successfully completed at least three (3) similar evaluation assignments during the last Seven (07) years. (Firms shall provide documentary evidence containing number, scale, and nature of the similar assignments completed). (Quantitative)(Doc Required) | 20 | |
| • Demonstrate experience in institutional, portfolio, Programme, or organizational performance evaluations. (Firms shall provide documentary evidence to establish their experience & expertise). (Quantitative)(Doc Required) | 20 | |
| Management System: | ||
| Comprehensive corporate profile demonstrating at least ten (10) years of operation and organizational growth (Quantitative)(Doc Required) | 5 | |
| Clear organizational structure with defined reporting lines, governance arrangements, and management systems (Quantitative)(Doc Required) | 5 | |
| Availability of qualified professionals/experts covering all areas of expertise required under the TORs (Quantitative)(Doc Required) | 10 | |
| Financial Soundness: | ||
| The Bidder’s net worth for the last three years, calculated as the difference between total assets and total liabilities, should be positive. (Quantitative)(Doc Required) | 10 | |
Positions Without Lots :
Position: Hiring of Consulting Firm to Conduct Institutional Performance Evaluation of NDRMF (2016-2025)
Specifications / Requirements:
Terms of Reference (ToR) – Institutional Performance Evaluation of NDRMF (2016-2025)The National Disaster Risk Management Fund (NDRMF) intends to engage a qualified consulting firm to undertake an Institutional Performance Evaluation covering the period 2016-2025.
The evaluation will provide an independent assessment of NDRMF's institutional performance, operational effectiveness, governance systems, and the results achieved through a representative sample of NDRMF-financed interventions. It will identify institutional strengths, implementation challenges, lessons learned, and practical recommendations to strengthen future operations and support implementation of the NDRMF Business Strategy 2023-2033.
The assignment will adopt a mixed-methods approach consistent with the OECD-DAC Evaluation Criteria, combining document review, portfolio analysis, stakeholder consultations, and field verification. The evaluation will assess NDRMF's contribution to strengthening disaster risk reduction, climate resilience, disaster risk financing, and institutional capacity, based on available evidence. It is not intended to establish causal attribution through experimental or quasi-experimental methods.
The assignment shall be completed within sixteen (16) weeks from contract signing.
NDRMF is a Government-owned, not-for-profit company established in 2016 to finance and support initiatives that strengthen Pakistan's resilience to disasters and climate change. Since becoming operational, NDRMF has financed a diverse portfolio of interventions in disaster risk reduction (DRR), climate change adaptation (CCA), disaster risk financing (DRF), preparedness, resilient recovery, and institutional strengthening through federal and provincial government agencies and other Fund Implementing Partners (FIPs).
As NDRMF approaches a decade of operations, it is timely to undertake an independent evaluation to assess both institutional performance and the contribution of its investment portfolio to intended development outcomes. This is the first institution-wide performance evaluation commissioned by NDRMF. The evaluation will provide evidence on how effectively NDRMF's governance, systems, and operational arrangements have supported delivery of its mandate, and the extent to which its investments have contributed to strengthening disaster and climate resilience.
The findings will support organizational learning, strengthen accountability, and provide practical recommendations to improve institutional performance, enhance future investments, and inform implementation of the NDRMF Business Strategy 2023-2033.
The purpose of this assignment is to undertake an independent Institutional and Portfolio Performance Evaluation of the NDRMF covering the period 2016-2025.
The evaluation will assess the effectiveness of NDRMF's institutional systems, governance arrangements, operational processes, and organizational performance, together with the performance of a representative sample of NDRMF-financed interventions. The evaluation will generate evidence on institutional effectiveness, portfolio performance, lessons learned, and development outcomes to support organizational learning and implementation of the NDRMF Business Strategy 2023-2033.
The specific objectives of the evaluation are to:
The evaluation shall cover NDRMF's institutional and portfolio performance during the period 2016-2025. It will assess the effectiveness of NDRMF's institutional systems and the performance of a representative sample of NDRMF-financed interventions across major thematic areas.
The evaluation shall focus on the following three components.
(THIS FIELD MAX CHARACTER UTILIZED. PLEASE REFER TO CORRESPONDING SECTION OF SCOPE OF SERVICE IN THISÂ DOC)
As attached Scope of Work
Attached
Attached
Corporate profile indicating years of operations. Complete organogram along with availability of number of experienced professionals as per the TORs.