In terms of Rules 65 of Public Procurement Rules, 2026 Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) is notified for the subject procurement and notification copy is available on the procuring agency’s website and also available on EPADS v2.0 as well as Authority’s website at (www.ppra.gov.pk).
Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE)), Assistant Director
Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory
+92-331-633-3028
ad.it@fde.gov.pk
The following specific data for the procurement of Goods to be procured shall complement, supplement, or amend the provisions in the Instructions to Bidders (ITB). Whenever there is a conflict, the provisions herein shall prevail over those in ITB.
BDS Clause Number
ITB Number
Amendments of, and Supplements to, Clauses in the Instruction to Bidders
BDS Clause Number 1
ITB Number 1.1
Name of Procuring Agency: Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE))
The subject of procurement is: Hiring of Consultancy Firm for Third-Party Review of FDE Institutions
Expected commencement date: Monday, November 30, 2026
BDS Clause Number 2
ITB Number 2.1
Financial year for the operations of the Procuring Agency: 2026-27
Name and identification number of the Contract: P167400
BDS Clause Number 3
ITB Number 4.6
JV/Consortium or Association Allowed: No
Number of JV/Consortium Members: Nil
BDS Clause Number 4
ITB Number 7.1
The Bidders may seek clarifications through EPADS v2.0: Clarification Date: Saturday, November 7, 2026
Pre-Bid Meeting: Thursday, October 29, 2026 12:00 AM
Venue: Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad.
BDS Clause Number 5
ITB Number 8.1
Any addendum, in case issued, shall be published on Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE)) website and on EPADS v2.0.
BDS Clause Number 6
ITB Number9.1
List of documents required along with the bid: No
BDS Clause Number 7
ITB Number 11.1
The qualification criteria to establish the supply / production capability of the bidder.
see Eligibility Criteria
BDS Clause Number 8
ITB Number 7.6
Services and Their related documents:
See section Required Services and Scope of Work
BDS Clause Number 9
ITB Number 13.1 & 13.2
Price schedule will be provided according to the format defined and acquired.
see section price schedule.
BDS Clause Number 10
ITB Number 7.6.2
Specifications:
see section of specifications.
BDS Clause Number 11
ITB Number 13.5
The price shall be Fixed.
BDS Clause Number 12
ITB Number 15.1
Currency of the Bids shall be : PKR
BDS Clause Number 13
ITB Number 16.1
The Bids/Bid Validity period shall be: 90 Days
BDS Clause Number 14
ITB Number 17.1
The amount of Bid Security shall be as defined in Bid Security Section for items and lots given in BDS 6
Instrument of Bid Security Shall be in the Name of : DDO, FDE
The Bid Security shall be in the form of: Pay Order, Call at Deposit, Demand Draft
BDS Clause Number 15
ITB Number 17.3
The Bids security shall be valid for twenty-eight (28) days beyond the expiry of the Bids validity period specified in the bidding documents, for example the bid validity is 180 days so the bid security shall be valid for 180+28 = 208 days.
BDS Clause Number 16
ITB Number 18.1
Alternative Bids to the requirements of the bidding documents will not be permitted.
BDS Clause Number 17
ITB Number 21.1
Bid shall be submitted online on EPADS v2.0 whereas hard copy of the bid security should be submitted to the following;
Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory
Bids that are not submitted on EPADS v2.0 shall be disqualified.
The deadline for Bids submission is: Tuesday, November 10, 2026 11:00 AM
BDS Clause Number 18
ITB Number 26.1
The Bids opening shall take place on EPADS v2.0.
Day : Tuesday
Date: Tuesday, November 10, 2026
Time : 11:30 AM
BDS Clause Number 19
ITB Number 32.1
Selection technique adopted will be: Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS)
see Evaluation Criteria
BDS Clause Number 20
ITB Number 49.1
The Performance guarantee shall: 10.00%.
The Performance Guarantee shall be acceptable in the form of: Pay Order, Call at Deposit, Demand Draft
BDS Clause Number 21
ITB Number 51.1
Arbitrator shall be appointed by mutual consent of the both parties.
BDS Clause Number 22
ITB Number 53.1
Grievence against this procurement shall be submitted online on EPADS v2.0.
All Active Taxpayers shall be eligible to participate in the procurement process, unless expressly excluded or otherwise restricted under the Eligibility Criteria specified by the Procuring Agency.
| Required Registration |
|---|
|
NADRA CITIZENSHIP (CNIC/NICOP) FBR (NTN) FBR (GSTN) SECP |
| Eligibility Criteria | Document |
|---|---|
| Registration with relevant Government authorities to engage in business in case of firms /Certificate of Incorporation in the case of companies. | Yes |
| Registered with FBR, having valid NTN and GST registration with active status on tax payers list. | Yes |
| Tax returns for the last three years (most recent). | Yes |
| Minimum Rs. 10 million average annual turnover of last consecutive three financial years. (Audited Financial Statements specifying the net worth & turnover for the specified years shall be provided.) | Yes |
| Affidavit on stamp paper that the Firm/agency is not blacklisted / debarred by any Government, Semi Government organisation or Autonomous body. | Yes |
Quality and Cost Based Selection (QCBS)
Weightage
| Technical Evaluation % | Financial Evaluation % |
|---|---|
| 60 | 40 |
| Technical Marks | 100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Passing Marks | 60 | |
| Relevant Experience of the Firm (15 Marks Total) | ||
| Education Sector Reviews, Institutional Assessment & Public-Sector Reform: 1 mark per completed assignment in public-sector institutional reviews, governance assessments, and school quality reform (Max 6 Marks; i.e., up to 6 assignments ) (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 6 | |
| Comparative Public-Private Benchmarking & Value-Add Studies: 1 mark per completed assignment involving comparative school benchmarking (e.g., Beaconhouse, City Schools etc.), standardized learning assessments, and SES value-add analysis (Max 5 Marks; i.e., up to 5 assignments) (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 5 | |
| School Performance Indexing, League Tables & Multi-Year KPI Reviews: 1 mark per completed assignment designing school performance indices, league tables, or multi-year financial/performance reviews (Max 4 Marks; i.e., up to 4 assignments). (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 4 | |
| Qualification and Experience of Proposed Team (20 Marks Total) | ||
| 6 or more PhD degree holders in relevant fields among key experts — i.e. Team Leader / Education Policy Expert, School Quality and Assessment Expert, Data Analyst / Statistician / Psychometric Support, Private Sector Efficiency and Operation Expert, HR and governance expert, Early Years / FLN Specialist: (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 6 | |
| 4 or more Master’s (18 Years) / Professional Certification (i.e. CA / ACCA) holders for Remaining Key Experts i.e. Public Finance, Procurement, and Costing Expert, Digital Learning / EdTech Specialist (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 4 | |
| Relevant Post-Qualification Experience of Key Experts (10 Marks): • Team Leader / Education Policy Expert (12+ yrs experience): 2.0 Marks • Public Finance, Procurement & Costing Expert (10+ yrs experience): 1.0 Marks • School Quality & Assessment Expert (10+ yrs experience): 1.0 Marks • Data Analyst / Statistician / Psychometrician (8+ yrs experience): 1.0 Marks • Human Resource & Governance Expert (8+ yrs experience): 1.0 Mark • PPP / Private-Sector Efficiency Expert (8+ yrs experience): 1.0 Mark • Early Years / FLN Specialist (8+ yrs experience): 1.0 Mark • Digital Learning / EdTech Specialist (8+ yrs experience): 1.0 Mark • Field Coordinators (5+ yrs) & Enumerators (2+ yrs): 1.0 Mark (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 10 | |
| Financial Stability & Annual Turnover (13 Marks Total) | ||
| (Substantiated by last 3 years audited financial statements, bank statements, and FBR tax returns) (Qualitative)(Doc Required) Above 20 Million (13) Over 15 Millions upto 20 Million (10) Over 10 Millions upto 15 Millions (7) upto 10 Millions (4) | 13 | |
| Proposed Methodology & KPI Architecture (25 Marks) | ||
| Documented Technical Methodology (20 Marks): Sub-Division of Marks • Sampling Methodology: 5 Marks • Survey Design: 5 Marks • Realistic Gantt chart and sequencing of all 12 deliverables within the 12-week timeline (5 Marks). • FDE School Performance Index & Annual League Table Design (5 Marks): Operationalization of composite indicators across all five mandated KPI pillars (Quality KPIs, Learning KPIs, Access KPIs, Equity KPIs, and Institutional-Management KPIs). (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 20 | |
| Fieldwork Readiness (05 Marks Total): Sub-Divison of Marks • Structured stakeholder consultation plan covering MoFEPT/FDE officers, principals, teachers, students, AEOs, finance/procurement staff, SMCs, private school reps, and parents (3 Marks). • Child safeguarding protocols, data security, comment-response matrix, complete data handover to FDE, and notarized affidavit on e-stamp paper (2 Marks). (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 5 | |
| 5. Presentation: 15 Marks | ||
| Technical Presentation on Methodology & KPIs (15 Marks): • Live demonstration by the Team Leader and core experts of the SES value-add econometric model, diagnostic testing design, and interactive prototype of the FDE School Performance Index and Annual League Table before the Evaluation Committee (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 7 | |
| Technical Presentation on Costing & Public Finance (05 Marks): • Live walk-through by the Public Finance & Costing Expert of the cost-per-student analytical model, AGPR/procurement bottleneck mapping, and 5-year financial verification protocol (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 5 | |
| Technical Presentation on 12-Week Execution & Risk Mitigation (03 Marks): • Defense of fieldwork logistics, parallel deployment of enumerator teams across ICT public and private schools, and risk mitigation to guarantee 12-week completion (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 3 | |
| 6. 5-Year Financials, Costing & Public Finance Analysis Model - Documented Financial & Public Finance Approach: (12 Marks) | ||
| • 5-Year Financial & Performance Analysis Verification Model (4 Marks): Framework for verifying and analyzing 5-year historical expenditure, revenue, enrollment, learning outcomes, and KPIs. (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 4 | |
| • Comprehensive Cost-Per-Student Model (4 Marks): Separation of recurrent, development, pension, and administrative overheads from classroom-facing expenditure in FDE vs. full private school unit costs (tuition fee, book packs, annual charges, uniform charges, stationery, events/activities, utilities, security, transport). (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 4 | |
| • Public Finance & Procurement Bottleneck Analysis (4 Marks): Review of budget formulation, release, re-appropriation, procurement, AGPR payment processing, taxation/compliance, and fund utilization timelines vs. private-sector spending flexibility. (Qualitative)(Doc Required) | 4 | |
Positions Without Lots :
| Position | Delivery Schedule | Quantity | Bid Security |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hiring of Consultancy Firm for Third-Party Review of FDE | Address: Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory Schedule: 5 days (after award of contract) Quantity: 1/job |
1/job | 700000 PKR |
No
Positions Without Lots :
Position: Hiring of Consultancy Firm for Third-Party Review of FDE
Specifications / Requirements:
5. Scope of Work To conduct an independent, evidence-based, Third party review of FDE to device strategy to ensure quality at par with private school systems. Benchmark with eg Beaconhouse, City Schools. Benchmark Schools internally and publish school league table. Manage performance via quality and access KPIs. Submit financials and results for 5 years. A. Comparative Review of Private Educational Institutions The consulting firm shall select a representative sample of private educational institutions including Beaconhouse and City Schools operating in Islamabad Capital Territory. It shall distinguish between school-level value-add and advantages arising from student selection, household income, parental education, home learning environment, language exposure, and fee-paying capacity. • Per-student expenditure and major expenditure heads, including infrastructure, administration, utilities, technology, security, transport, maintenance, co-curricular activities, and student support. • Fee structure, revenue model, reinvestment pattern, financial autonomy, fund availability, and spending flexibility. • Teacher qualification, workload, retention, training, monitoring, and accountability. • Student-teacher ratio, average class size, teaching load, non-teaching support, academic supervision, and remedial support systems. • Parent communication, complaint handling, parental involvement, and community engagement systems. • Parent Qualification, income, socio-cultural advantages • Quality assurance frameworks, internal inspection protocols, academic calendars, dashboards, classroom observation, and performance review mechanisms. • Use of technology, digital content, smart classrooms, AI in teaching practices etc. B. Early Years and Preschool-Primary Learning Ladder The consultancy shall map gaps in FDE’s early childhood and early primary learning pathway against national curriculum expectations, FDE’s foundational learning priorities, and relevant good practices from private institutions. The scope is limited to diagnostic mapping, readiness standards, transition benchmarks, and design options for a Preschool-Primary Learning Ladder. Map learning progression from ECE/Prep to Grade III, especially readiness for literacy, numeracy, socio-emotional learning, language exposure, and classroom routines. • Identify gaps between current FDE practice, National Curriculum expectations, Federal Foundational Learning Policy priorities, and selected private-sector early learning practices. • Propose indicative transition benchmarks and assessment checkpoints for ECE/Prep, Grade I, Grade II, and Grade III. • Review of teacher training, parental guidance, remedial support, and classroom resource requirements needed to operationalize the pathway. C. Cost-Quality, Efficiency, and Public Finance Analysis The consulting firm shall conduct a cost, quality, and efficiency analysis that accounts for the structural differences between public- and private-sector financing. The analysis shall distinguish classroom-level and student-facing expenditures from system-level and administrative obligations, and assess not only the level and composition of spending, but also the timeliness, flexibility, efficiency, and usability of available funds. • Calculate or estimate actual cost per student in FDE institutions and selected private institutions including fee, cost of book packs, annual charges, uniform charges, stationery, event and activities using transparent assumptions and separating recurrent, development, administrative, and classroom-facing expenditure. • Review budget formulation, approval, release, re-appropriation, procurement, payment, AGPR processing, taxation/compliance requirements, and fund utilization timelines affecting FDE institutions. • Compare public-sector spending with private-sector financials, including ability to procure quickly, maintain facilities, and respond to urgent academic or operational needs. • Identify reforms that can improve fund utilization and identify areas requiring policy, procedural, delegation, or regulatory changes. • Identify where better management can improve outcomes without additional spending and where additional investment is essential to meet minimum quality standards. D. Learning Outcomes, Socio-Economic Status (SES) and Diagnostic Assessment The learning outcomes component shall be designed to produce comparable, context-adjusted evidence. • Conduct a desk review of available assessment data—drawn from reports generated by asessment bodies/firms—to evaluate the diagnostic assessments of comparable student samples from FDE and private institutions. • Collect socio-economic and contextual variables, including parental education, parental occupation, household assets, home learning resources, language exposure, fee category, school selection criteria, student age, gender, prior schooling, and attendance. Read attachment for More DetailsScope of Work
To conduct an independent, evidence-based, Third party review of FDE to device strategy to ensure quality at par with private school systems. Benchmark with eg Beaconhouse, City Schools. Benchmark Schools internally and publish school league table. Manage performance via quality and access KPIs. Submit financials and results for 5 years.
The consulting firm shall select a representative sample of private educational institutions including Beaconhouse and City Schools operating in Islamabad Capital Territory. It shall distinguish between school-level value-add and advantages arising from student selection, household income, parental education, home learning environment, language exposure, and fee-paying capacity.
The consultancy shall map gaps in FDE’s early childhood and early primary learning pathway against national curriculum expectations, FDE’s foundational learning priorities, and relevant good practices from private institutions. The scope is limited to diagnostic mapping, readiness standards, transition benchmarks, and design options for a Preschool-Primary Learning Ladder.
Map learning progression from ECE/Prep to Grade III, especially readiness for literacy, numeracy, socio-emotional learning, language exposure, and classroom routines.
The consulting firm shall conduct a cost, quality, and efficiency analysis that accounts for the structural differences between public- and private-sector financing. The analysis shall distinguish classroom-level and student-facing expenditures from system-level and administrative obligations, and assess not only the level and composition of spending, but also thetimeliness, flexibility, efficiency, and usability of available funds.
The learning outcomes component shall be designed to produce comparable, context-adjusted evidence.
The consulting firm shall conduct structured consultations with senior officers of MoFEPT and FDE, heads of institutions, teachers, students, parents, AEOs, finance/budget and procurement staff, private school representatives, school management committees where applicable, and relevant regulators or experts. Parent consultations must capture expectations, education choices, satisfaction levels, communication needs, affordability concerns, and parent education needs.
1. BackgroundThe Ministry of Federal Education and Professional Training requires a third-party review of the Federal Directorate of Education (FDE) to devise a strategy for achieving quality comparable with private school systems. The review is being undertaken in the context of the Government of Pakistan’s rightsizing and institutional performance agenda and bringing FDE Quality at par with private school systems.
This assignment will therefore conduct an independent diagnostic review of FDE institutions and a context-sensitive comparison with selected private educational institutions in Islamabad Capital Territory. The review shall not rely on expenditure or examination results alone. It shall assess the actual institutional value-add after accounting for student background, socio-economic status, parental education, selection practices, learning conditions, and differences in examination boards. The assignment shall also examine public-sector financing and spending procedures that affect timely resource utilization and service delivery.
2. Title of AssignmentThird-Party Review of FDE
3. Overall ObjectiveTo conduct an independent, evidence-based, Third party review of FDE to device strategy to ensure quality at par with private school systems. Benchmark with eg Beaconhouse, City Schools. Benchmark Schools internally and publish school league table. Manage performance via quality and access KPIs. Submit financials and results for 5 years.
Â
4. Specific Objectives
Considering the scale of diagnostic review, tool validation, public-private comparison, financial analysis, diagnostic assessment, SES adjustment, and data validation, the assignment shall be planned for a minimum duration of 12 weeks from signing of contract. The final work plan shall be approved after the inception report.
|
Sr. |
Deliverable |
Main Contents |
Indicative Timeline |
|
1 |
Kick-off and Inception Report |
Understanding of assignment, refined methodology, detailed work plan, sampling strategy, stakeholder engagement plan, quality assurance plan, risk management plan, and detailed timeline. |
Week 1 |
|
2 |
Tool Development, Pilot Testing, and Validation |
Draft and finalized instruments for school review, finance / procurement review, parent / student / teacher surveys, classroom observation, infrastructure assessment, and uniform diagnostic assessment; pilot findings and revisions. |
Week 2 |
|
3 |
Sampling Finalization and Fieldwork Readiness Note |
Approved sample, field protocols, consent procedures, training of enumerators, assessment administration protocols, data security arrangements, and field schedule. |
Week 3 |
|
4 |
Field Data Collection Progress Note |
Progress of visits to FDE and private institutions, stakeholder consultations, desk review of assessment data, finance / procurement interviews, and issues requiring facilitation. |
Weeks 4-5 |
|
5 |
Data Cleaning, Validation, and Analytical Framework Note |
Cleaned datasets, SES variables, diagnostic assessment scoring method, cost-per-student, finance mechanism review framework, and validation plan. |
Week 6 |
|
6 |
Draft Diagnostic Review Report of FDE |
Findings on FDE governance, academic systems, HR, finance, infrastructure, student support, digital systems, roadmap alignment. |
Week 7 |
|
7 |
Draft Comparative Cost-Quality and Value-Add Analysis Report |
Public-private comparison, SES-adjusted learning analysis, diagnostic assessment findings, cost-quality analysis, financing mechanism analysis, and adaptable private-sector practices. |
Weeks 8 |
|
9 |
FDE School Performance Index to benchmark institutions internally |
Develop an evidence-based FDE School Performance Index to benchmark institutions internally, identify high-performing and improving schools, and publish an annual School Performance League Table based on transparent quality, learning, access, equity and institutional-management KPIs. |
Week 9 |
|
10 |
5 Years Financials and Results Data |
Submit verified financial data and educational performance results for the preceding five years, with year-wise analysis of expenditure, enrollment, learning outcomes, and key performance indicators. |
Week 10 |
|
11 |
Final Reform Strategy and Implementation Roadmap |
Immediate, short-term, medium-term, and long-term reforms with cost implications, responsible offices, legal/administrative requirements, KPIs, risk mitigation, and monitoring framework. |
Week 11 |
|
12 |
Final Report and Presentation |
Final consolidated report, executive summary, annexes, datasets/tools as agreed, and presentation to MoFE&PT / FDE leadership. |
Week 12 |
The consulting firm needs to have demonstrated experience in education sector analysis, institutional review, public-sector reform, school quality assessment, learning assessment, financial and expenditure analysis, public finance / procurement systems, comparative benchmarking, policy reform, data collection, and stakeholder consultations.
|
Sr. |
Position |
Key Responsibility |
|
1 |
Team Leader / Education Policy Expert |
Overall leadership, methodology, policy review, stakeholder engagement, quality assurance, roadmap alignment, and final reporting. |
|
2 |
Public Finance, Procurement, and Costing Expert |
Budget analysis, cost-per-student calculation, expenditure review, AGPR / payment and procurement process analysis, public-private financing comparison, and costed recommendations. |
|
3 |
School Quality and Assessment Expert |
School quality indicators, classroom observation, diagnostic assessment design, SLO mapping, learning environment review, and benchmarking. |
|
4 |
Data Analyst / Statistician / Psychometric Support |
Sampling, data cleaning, SES adjustment, diagnostic assessment scoring, statistical analysis, visualization, and validation of quantitative findings. |
|
5 |
Human Resource and Governance Expert |
Teacher deployment, workload, attendance, accountability, institutional governance, leadership systems, and management arrangements. |
|
6 |
Private-Sector Efficiency and Operations Expert |
Assessment of private-sector management practices, financial flexibility, partnership models, outsourcing options, service delivery efficiencies, and applicability within public-sector rules. |
|
7 |
Early Years / FLN Specialist |
Review of early childhood and early primary learning pathway, FLN benchmarks, Preschool-Primary Learning Ladder mapping, and readiness standards. |
|
8 |
Digital Learning / EdTech Specialist |
LMS, digital content, smart classrooms, Chromebooks, digital hub, data systems, hybrid learning, and EdTech integration review. |
|
9 |
Field Coordinators / Enumerators |
Field visits, surveys, interviews, diagnostic assessment administration, data collection, and logistical coordination. |
Â
8. Data and Support to be Provided by FDEFDE may facilitate access to relevant official records and coordinate field access, subject to applicable rules, confidentiality requirements, and approval of competent authority. Data availability shall be confirmed during inception.
The consulting firm shall report to a committee notified by MoFEPT/FDE. The committee shall review deliverables, facilitate data access, validate methodology, and provide consolidated comments within agreed timelines.
All reports shall be submitted in editable soft form and hard form. The firm shall maintain a comment-response matrix for all major deliverables.
Â
Remaining part of the document is in Brief Description
At the end of exercise all data collected in connection with the endeavor must be handed over to FDE and no duplicate copies shall be retained. Notarized affidavit to this effect must be submitted on e-stamp paper.
11. Evaluation Criteria For Selection of Firms 12. Ownership of Data and ReportsAll data, tools, diagnostic instruments, reports, presentations, findings, datasets, and recommendations prepared under this assignment shall be the property of FDE. The consulting firm shall not publish, share, or use any part of the assignment output without prior written approval of the competent authority.
13. Final RecommendationThe consultancy should not merely compare government and private institutions on the basis of expenditure, fee level, or examination results. It must determine, through a context-adjusted and evidence-based methodology, whether quality differences are due to higher spending, better management, selective student intake, parental background, financial flexibility, teacher performance, accountability, infrastructure, technology adoption, student support, or other institutional factors. The final output must provide FDE with a realistic, implementable, equity-sensitive, and cost-conscious roadmap to improve quality across its institutions while remaining consistent with relevant laws / rules.
For Individual Positions
| # | Position Title | Quantity | Unit Price (PKR) | Total Price (PKR) | Delivery Location | Delivery Period / Year | Country of Origin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | |||||||
| 2 |
| # | Lot Title | Total Lot Price (PKR) | Country of Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | [Lot 1 Title] |
The following Special Conditions of Contract shall supplement the General Conditions of Contract. Whenever there is a conflict, the provisions herein shall prevail over those in the Conditions of Contract. The corresponding clause number of the GCC is indicated in parentheses.
Number of GC Clause
Amendments of, and Supplements to, Clauses in the General Conditions of Contract
Definitions
The Procuring Agency is: Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE)), Assistant Director Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory
Contractor is:
The title of the subject procurement is:Hiring of Consultancy Firm for Third-Party Review of FDE Institutions
Number of GC Clause 2
Applicable/Governing Law:
The Contract shall be interpreted in accordance with the laws of Islamic Republic of Pakistan
Number of GC Clause 3
Language:
The language of the Contract, all correspondence and communications to be given, and all other documentation to be prepared and supplied under the Contract shall be in English.
Number of GC Clause 4
Notices:
The addresses for the notices are:
Procuring Agency:
Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE)), Assistant Director
Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory
+92-331-633-3028
ad.it@fde.gov.pk
Contractor/ Bidder:
[Name, address and telephone number].
The Contractor/ Bidder’s Representative(s)
[Name, address, telephone number and e-mail address]
Number of GC Clause 6.1
The Authorized Representatives are:
For the Procuring Agency:
Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE)), Assistant Director
Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory
+92-331-633-3028
ad.it@fde.gov.pk
For the Bidder:
Name: ………………………
Designation: ……………..
Address: ……………………………..
Number of GC Clause 7
Effectiveness of the contract
The Contractor/Bidder shall be effective within ….. days from the date of signature of the Contract by both parties
Number of GC Clause 8
Commencement of Contract:
The Contractor/ Bidder shall provide Non-Consultancy Services from the effective date of contract.
Number of GC Clause 10.2
Expiration of Contract:
The time period shall be ………………….
Number of GC Clause 14
Termination
In the event of termination of the contract due to any reason as already defined in the General Conditions of Contract, the Bidder shall be responsible for providing to the Authority the Goods till the time of alternate arrangements.
Number of GC Clause 16
Conflict of Interest:
The Procuring Agency reserves the right to determine on a case-by-case basis whether the Bidder should be disqualified from providing goods or services due to a conflict of a nature described in Clause GCC 16.
Number of GC Clause 20
Liquidated Damages
If the Bidder fails to provide services as required under the contract or in case of any data loss/data breach or any incident compromising the data security or other such failures related to any services, the Bidder shall pay to the Procuring Agency as Liquidated Damages at a rate of 0.10% to 5.00% of the Contract value, in accordance with the extent of performance failure & the cost of investigating such incidents as judged by the Authority.
Number of GC Clause 21
Performance Guarantee:
Instrument of Performance Guarantee shall be in the Name of : DDO, FDE
The amount of performance guarantee shall be 10.00% of the contract price in acceptable form of Pay Order, Call at Deposit, Demand Draft
Number of GC Clause 27
Currency of Payment:
All the payment to be released to the contractor/Bidder shall be in Pakistani Rupees.
Number of GC Clause 28
Payment terms:
Payment will be made to the Bidder against the procured Goods and services according to the actual invoice or running bills submitted by the Bidder against the services provided within the time given in the conditions of the contract.
Number of GC Clause 29
Identifying Defects:
The Authority reserves the right at any time to inspect the premises of the provider to inspect the goods and monitor the goods being provided.
Number of GC Clause 31
Following is the guidance for Dispute Resolution
Notwithstanding any reference to the arbitration herein, the parties shall continue to perform their respective obligations under the Contract unless they otherwise agree that the Authority shall pay the Bidder any monies due to the Bidder.
Arbitrator’s fee:
The fee shall be specified in Pak Rupees, as determined by the Arbitrator, which shall be shared equally by both parties.
Appointing Authority for Arbitrator:
By the Mutual Consent or in accordance with the provisions of Arbitration Act, 1940, in case the parties fail to reach a consensus on the name of sole arbitrator, any party may submit an application to the Chief Justice Islamabad High Court for appointment of sole arbitrator. The Chief Justice IHC may appoint a former judge of any High Court or Supreme Court as the sole arbitrator to resolve the dispute between the parties.
Rules of procedure for arbitration proceedings:
Any dispute between the Authority and a Bidder who is a national of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan arising in connection with the present Contract shall be referred to adjudication or arbitration in accordance with the laws of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan including Arbitration Act 1940, however above provision shall prevail in referring the case to the Arbitrator.
Place of Arbitration and Award:
The arbitration shall be conducted in English language and place of arbitration shall be at Islamabad. The award of the arbitrator shall be final and shall be binding on the parties.
Date: [insert date (as day, month and year)]
Bid No.:P167400
To: Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE)), Assistant Director Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory
We, the undersigned, declare that:
We understand that, according to your conditions, Bids must be supported by a Bid Securing Declaration.
We accept that we will be blacklisted and henceforth cross debarred for participating in respective category of public procurement proceedings for a period of (not more than) six months, if fail to abide with a bid securing declaration, however without indulging in corrupt and fraudulent practices, if we are in breach of our obligation(s) under the Bid conditions, because we:
We understand this Bid Securing Declaration shall expire if we are not the successful
Bidder, upon the earlier of (i) our receipt of your notification to us of the name of the successful Bidder; or (ii) twenty-eight (28) days after the expiration of our Bid.
THIS AGREEMENT made the _____ day of __________ 20_____ between Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE)), Assistant Director Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory
(hereinafter called “the Procuring Agency”) of the one part and [name of Bidder] of [city and country of Bidder] (hereinafter called “the Bidder”) of the other part:
WHEREAS the Procuring Agency invited Bids for provision of goods, viz., Hiring of Consultancy Firm for Third-Party Review of FDE Institutions (P167400) and has accepted a Bids by the Bidder for the provision of Services in the sum of [contract price in words and figures] (hereinafter called “the Contract Price”).
NOW THIS CONTRACT WITNESSETH AS FOLLOWS:
1. In this Contract words and expressions shall have the same meanings as are respectively assigned to them in the Conditions of Contract referred to.
2. The following documents shall be deemed to form and be read and construed as part of this Contract, In the event of any ambiguity or conflict between the Contract Documents listed below, the order of precedence shall be the order in which the Contract Documents are listed below:-
3. In consideration of the payments to be made by the Procuring Agency to the Bidder as hereinafter mentioned, the Bidder hereby covenants with the Procuring Agency to provide the Goods related services and to remedy defects therein in conformity in all respects with the provisions of the Contract.
4. The Procuring Agency hereby covenants to pay the Bidder in consideration of the provision of Goods and the remedying of defects therein, the Contract Price or such other sum as may become payable under the provisions of the contract at the times and in the manner prescribed by the contract.
IN WITNESS whereof the parties hereto have caused this Contract to be executed in accordance with their respective laws the day and year first above written.
Signed, sealed, delivered by __________________the ________________ (for the Procuring Agency)
Witness to the signatures of the Procuring Agency:
………………………………………………
Signed, sealed, delivered by __________________the ________________ (for the Procuring Agency)
Witness to the signatures of the Bidder: …………………………………………………
Contract Number: Contract Value: Contract Title:
Dated:
[Name of Supplier] hereby declares that it has not obtained or induced the procurement of any contract, right, interest, privilege or other obligation or benefit from Government of Pakistan or any administrative subdivision or agency thereof or any other entity owned or controlled by it (GoP) through any corrupt business practice.
Without limiting the generality of the foregoing [Name of Supplier] represents and warrants that it has fully declared the brokerage, commission, fee etc. paid or payable to anyone and not given or agreed to give and shall not give or agree to give to anyone within or outside Pakistan either directly or indirectly through any natural or juridical person, including its affiliate, agent, associate, broker, consultant, director, promoter, shareholder, sponsor or subsidiary, any commission, gratification, bribe, finder's fee or kickback, whether described as consultations fee or otherwise, with the object of obtaining or inducing the procurement of a contract, right, interest, privilege or other obligation or benefit in whatsoever form from GoP, except that which has been expressly declared pursuant hereto.
[Name of Supplier] certifies that it has made and will make full disclosure of all agreements and arrangements with all persons in respect of or related to the transaction with GoP and has not taken any action or will not take any action to circumvent the above declaration, representative or warranty.
[Name of Supplier] accepts full responsibility and strict liability for making and false declaration, not making full disclosure, misrepresenting fact or taking any action likely to defeat the purpose of this declaration, representation and warranty. It agrees that any contract, right interest, privilege or other obligation or benefit obtained or procured as aforesaid shall, without prejudice to any other right and remedies available to GoP under any law, contract or other instrument, be voidable at the option of GoP.
Notwithstanding any rights and remedies exercised by GoP in this regard, [Name of Supplier] agrees to indemnify GoP for any loss or damage incurred by it on account of its corrupt business practices and further pay compensation to GoP in an amount equivalent to ten time the sum of any commission, gratification, bribe, finder's fee or kickback given by [Name of Supplier] as aforesaid for the purpose of obtaining or inducing the procurement of any contract, right, interest, privilege or other obligation or benefit in whatsoever form from GoP.
To: Federal Directorate of Education. (Federal Directorate of Education (FDE)), Assistant Director Rohtas road, G-9/4 Islamabad., Islamabad Capital Territory
WHEREAS [name of Bidder] (hereinafter called “the Bidder”) has undertaken, in pursuance of Contract No. [reference number of the contract] dated [insert date] for provision of Non-Consultancy Services(hereinafter called “the Contract”).
AND WHEREAS it has been stipulated by you in the said Contract that the Bidder shall furnish you with a Bank Guarantee by a reputable bank for the sum specified therein as security for compliance with the Bidder’s performance obligations in accordance with the Contract.
AND WHEREAS we have agreed to give the Bidders guarantee:
THEREFORE, WE hereby affirm that we are Guarantors and responsible to you, on behalf of the Bidder, up to a total of [amount of the guarantee in words and figures], and we undertake to pay you, upon your first written demand declaring the Bidder to be in default under the Contract and without cavil or argument, any sum or sums within the limits of [amount of guarantee] as aforesaid, without your needing to prove or to show grounds or reasons for your demand or the sum specified therein.
This guarantee is valid until the: [insert date]
Signature and seal of the Guarantors
_____________________________________________________________________
[name of bank or financial institution]
_____________________________________________________________________
[address]
_____________________________________________________________________
[date}
past consecutive 3 years.
Most recent past consecutive 3 years audited statement (average annual turnover not less than 10 million)